news

1. The Perfect Packaging of the Sterile Egg Myth

The marketing machine of sterile eggs has meticulously constructed a myth of safety. On e-commerce platforms, promotional slogans such as "Japanese technology," "72-hour sterilization," and "safe for pregnant women to eat raw" are omnipresent, with each egg selling for 8 to 12 yuan, which is 4 to 6 times the price of ordinary eggs. Silver insulated boxes for cold chain delivery, Japanese minimalist packaging, and accompanying "raw consumption certification certificates" jointly weave the illusion of consumption for high-end food.

Marketing strategies backed by capital have achieved remarkable results. A leading brand's sales exceeded 230 million yuan in 2022, with related topics on social media generating over 1 billion views. Consumer surveys indicate that 68% of buyers believe them to be "safer," and 45% trust them to have "higher nutritional value. 

1. Laboratory Data Tears Away the Mask of Safety

Third-party testing institutions conducted blind tests on sterile eggs from eight mainstream brands on the market, and the results were shocking. Out of 120 samples, 23 tested positive for Salmonella, with a positive rate of 19.2%, and three brands exceeded the standard by 2 to 3 times. More ironically, the positive rate for ordinary eggs sampled during the same period was 15.8%, showing no positive correlation between price difference and safety coefficient.

Tests during the production process found that in workshops claiming to be "fully sterile," 31% of equipment actually had excessive total bacterial colony counts. A worker at a subcontracting factory revealed, "The so-called sterile treatment is just ordinary eggs passing through a sodium hypochlorite solution." During transportation, of the claimed constant temperature cold chain at 2-6°C, 36% of logistics vehicles had actual measured temperatures above 8°C.

The threat of Salmonella cannot be underestimated. Among the approximately 9 million foodborne disease cases in China each year, Salmonella infections account for over 70%. In a collective poisoning incident at a Japanese restaurant in Chengdu in 2019, the culprit was eggs labeled as "safe for raw consumption."

1. The Industrial Truth Behind the Safety Puzzle

The lack of standards for sterile eggs has fueled market chaos. Currently, China does not have specific standards for eggs that can be consumed raw, and enterprises mostly set their own standards or refer to Japan's Agricultural Standards (JAS). However, tests show that 78% of products claiming to "comply with JAS standards" did not meet Japan's requirement of zero Salmonella detection.

There is a severe imbalance between production costs and safety investment. Genuine sterile eggs require full-process management from breeder vaccine and feed control to the production environment, with costs being 8 to 10 times those of ordinary eggs. However, most products on the market adopt the "shortcut" of surface sterilization, with actual cost increases of less than 50%.

Misconceptions among consumers exacerbate risks. Surveys indicate that 62% of consumers believe that "expensive means safe," 41% still store them in the door compartment of the refrigerator (the area with the largest temperature fluctuations), and 79% are unaware that Salmonella can still slowly reproduce at 4°C.

This sterile egg controversy reflects the profound contradiction between food innovation and safety regulation. When capital exploits pseudo-concepts to harvest the market, the test reports in consumers' hands become the most powerful revelator of truth. There is no shortcut to food safety. What is truly worth pursuing is not the "sterile" concept packaged in marketing jargon but solid cultivation across the entire industry chain. Perhaps we should reconsider: While pursuing dietary trends, shouldn't we return to reverence for the essence of food?